China Cuts Japan Off From Gallium and Germanium

China exported zero kilograms of gallium and zero kilograms of germanium to Japan in January and February 2026, according to Chinese customs data published on March 21. In the same period last year, Japan received 8,007 kg of gallium and 400 kg of germanium. The cutoff follows Beijing's ban on dual-use exports to Japanese military-linked end users — but in practice, it's a total halt. The perception gap between how Beijing and Tokyo frame these same numbers is a 7 on Albis's PGI scale.

---

The Story From Beijing

China tightened export controls on dual-use goods. That's it. That's the story.

In January 2026, the Ministry of Commerce updated its licensing requirements for gallium and germanium — two metals with both commercial and military applications. Germanium-based infrared optics support military surveillance. Gallium compounds go into radar systems and missile guidance.

The controls don't mention Japan by name. They target military end users and dual-use supply chains. Beijing's line, delivered through state media, is consistent: these are legitimate national security measures, no different from the export controls that the United States, Japan, and the Netherlands imposed on semiconductor equipment sent to China.

From this angle, the story is about reciprocity. China restricted gallium and germanium starting in August 2023, citing potential military applications. The US restricted AI chips. The Netherlands restricted lithography machines. Japan restricted 23 categories of semiconductor manufacturing equipment in 2023.

China didn't start this, the framing says. It's responding.

And the timing? In November 2025, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told parliament that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute an "existential threat" to Japan under its peace legislation — language Beijing interpreted as a direct threat of military intervention. Xinhua called it "summoning militarist demons." People's Daily warned Japan would "suffer the results of its own evil actions."

The dual-use ban followed in January. From Beijing's perspective, you don't send military-grade materials to a country whose prime minister just threatened you with war.

Gallium prices have surged almost fourfold since the 2023 controls began. China controls roughly 80% of global gallium production and 60% of germanium. Silicon Canals reported that Beijing sees these controls as "surgical, calibrated, and instructive."

Germany received all of China's gallium exports in January and February — 11,000 kg total. Russia got 600 kg of germanium in February. The message: China is choosing who gets access, and the criteria isn't commercial demand. It's political alignment.

---

Now Flip.

The Story From Tokyo

Japan woke up to an empty pipeline. And it's terrified.

In 2025, Japan was the leading global destination for Chinese gallium exports. By January 2026, shipments dropped to zero. Not reduced. Not restricted. Zero.

Japanese media and Western outlets frame this differently from Beijing. The South China Morning Post — Hong Kong-based, often a bridge between the two framings — called it a "muted warning." The rawmaterials.net analysis was blunter: "Although China stated that restrictions would target military end users only, the practical effect — a full export halt to Japan — now threatens to impact the country's entire high-tech industry."

That's the gap. Beijing says it targeted military end users. The practical result is that Japan's entire rare earth supply chain is being squeezed.

Japan's 2026 Diplomatic Bluebook, drafted this week and reported by Reuters on March 24, downgraded China from "one of its most important" relationships to merely an "important neighbour." The Japan Times noted this is the sharpest diplomatic language shift in the annual report since it began tracking the relationship.

From Tokyo's perspective, this isn't about dual-use controls. It's about coercion. Japan made a statement about Taiwan. China responded by cutting off metals essential to Japan's semiconductor industry, its defence systems, and its renewable energy technology — all at once.

Japanese manufacturers now face a choice: find alternative suppliers for metals China dominates, or accept strategic dependence on a country that just demonstrated it will use that dependence as leverage. Japan and India have begun a rare earth mining partnership in Rajasthan — but it's years from producing at scale.

Meanwhile, Germany gets all the gallium. The Economist's framing of the broader China-Japan cold war — cancelled concerts, empty hotels, frozen tourism — provides the backdrop. This isn't one policy. It's a campaign.

---

What Shifted

Both versions use the same customs data. Both cite the same timeline. Both are factually defensible.

But one story is about a country defending itself. The other is about a country being attacked. The word "coercion" doesn't appear in Chinese coverage. The word "reciprocity" doesn't appear in Japanese coverage.

Which version did you read first — and what does it tell you about which side of the Pacific your information comes from?