The US and Iran Just Spent Nine Hours Talking. Here's Why They Still Walked Away.
Nine hours of negotiations. No deal. Two carrier groups in the Gulf. What's keeping the US and Iran from an agreement—and what happens next.
They talked for nine hours. Then they left without a deal.
US and Iranian negotiators sat in Geneva on Thursday for what mediators called "the most intense" nuclear talks in years. Oman — running the mediation — announced "significant progress." But no agreement. No breakthrough. Just a promise to meet again in Vienna next week.
Two American carrier strike groups sit in the Strait of Hormuz. Trump's weighing military options on a scale unseen since Iraq in 2003.
Here's what's actually going on.
What They're Fighting About
At the core, this is about uranium enrichment.
Iran's enriching uranium to 60% purity. Weapons-grade is 90%. Nuclear experts call 60% "near-weapons-grade" — not a bomb, but uncomfortably close.
The US wants Iran to stop. Iran wants sanctions lifted and the right to enrich for civilian purposes.
Neither side trusts the other.
How We Got Here
This didn't start yesterday.
In 2015, Iran signed the JCPOA — the nuclear deal negotiated by Obama with the UK, France, Germany, Russia, and China. Iran agreed to cap enrichment at 3.67%, allow inspectors in, and limit its stockpile. In return: sanctions lifted.
In 2018, Trump pulled the US out. Called it "the worst deal ever." Reimposed sanctions.
Iran held on for a year, then started breaking limits. By 2019, stockpile caps exceeded. By 2021, enriching past 3.67%. By 2026, 60%.
Iran's now closer to a bomb than before the deal existed.
What Each Side Wants
Iran's position:- Lift sanctions so we can sell oil and access global banking
- Let us enrich uranium for peaceful purposes (nuclear power, medical isotopes)
- Guarantee the US won't just walk away again like it did in 2018
- Stop enriching to 60%—immediately and permanently
- Let UN inspectors back in (Iran has been limiting access since 2021)
- Agree to stronger monitoring, including surprise inspections at undeclared sites
Iran says it needs guarantees. The US says it needs proof. Without trust, guarantees mean nothing. Without proof, trust is impossible.
Why Thursday's Talks Didn't Break Through
Sources close to the talks say the core issues haven't budged:
1. The stockpile. Iran's sitting on a pile of 60%-enriched uranium. The US wants it shipped out or diluted. Iran won't agree to either. 2. Inspectors. The US wants the IAEA inside every nuclear site, including military facilities. Iran's kept those doors shut since 2021. 3. Missiles. The US wants limits on Iran's ballistic missile program. Iran says missiles are defence, not negotiable. 4. Sequencing. Iran wants sanctions lifted first. The US wants concessions first. Classic deadlock.Oman's foreign minister said they'll reconvene in Vienna for "technical discussions." Diplomats rarely say "technical" when they mean "breakthrough."
What Happens Next
Three paths forward:
1. They Find a Deal
Possible, but neither side's shown willingness to compromise. A deal would probably look like:
- Iran caps enrichment at ~20% (research-grade, far from weapons)
- IAEA gets broader access (not unlimited)
- Sanctions lift in phases as Iran hits benchmarks
It'd take months. And it needs buy-in from Europe, Russia, and China.
2. Talks Collapse, Military Action Begins
If Vienna fails, the carriers are already in position. Bombing Iran's nuclear sites would set the program back years — but not destroy it. Underground facilities like Fordow are hardened against airstrikes.
Then what? Iran retaliates. Militias hit US forces. Oil spikes. The Strait of Hormuz — 20% of global oil — becomes a war zone.
3. Strategic Ambiguity Continues
No deal, no war. The US tightens sanctions. Iran inches toward 90%. Everyone gets used to living on the edge.
History says this is the likeliest outcome. Deals are hard. Wars are risky. Ambiguity is easy.
Why This Matters Beyond the Middle East
If Iran gets a bomb, the region reshuffles overnight.
Saudi Arabia's already said it'd pursue its own. Turkey might follow. Egypt could reconsider. The Middle East — multiple active conflicts, sectarian fault lines, a history of miscalculation — becomes a nuclear powder keg.
If the US bombs Iran instead? Oil markets convulse. Supply chains freeze. Every country with a stake in Middle East stability gets dragged in.
This isn't about two governments disagreeing. It's about whether nuclear non-proliferation — already fraying — holds together.
The Bottom Line
Nine hours in Geneva solved nothing. But nothing exploded either.
Vienna's next. If technical teams make progress, higher-level talks follow. If not, the carriers stay.
Two governments that don't trust each other are looking for a path between war and surrender. The clock's ticking. Nobody knows when it runs out.
Keep Reading
Iran Says Nuclear Deal Is 'Within Reach.' Oil Markets Aren't So Sure.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi's optimistic statement sent oil prices down 1% — but the US has 40,000 troops in the region and both sides remain sharply divided. Here's what's really happening.
China Built More Coal Plants Than Any Year Since 2008. It Also Built More Renewables Than Anyone in History. Here's How Both Are True.
The word 'despite' in every headline about China's energy does more work than any policy document. It assumes coal and renewables compete. They don't — not yet.
DeepSeek Trained on Nvidia's Best Chips. Now Nvidia Can't Use the Result.
Export controls created a world where the customer gets the product and the supplier doesn't. How America's chip restrictions just inverted tech dominance.
Explore Perspectives
Get this delivered free every morning
The daily briefing with perspectives from 7 regions — straight to your inbox.